Stellenbosch Law Review
Prof AM Louw (Editor)
ISSN: 1016-4359
Year: 2003 – Current
Published: Tri-annually
Accreditation(s):
About this publication
The Stellenbosch Law Review is a forum for the discussion of topical legal issues in various fields. As a law review the emphasis is on providing insight rather than just an overview. It maintains a balance between a wide variety of specialist fields and legal subjects of general interest.
VOLUMES AND ISSUES
Volume / Issue
Volume 33 Issue 4, 2022
Transformative social change and the role of the judge in post-apartheid South Africa
Author: Judge President Dunstan Mlambo
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, pp 595-604 (2022 I4)
Supervening impossibility of performance – a conceptual conundrum and restatement of principles
Author: Jacques du Plessis
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, pp 605-617 (2022 I4)
Signed, sealed and delivered (electronically): embracing the digital takeover. A brief consideration of electronic signing and delivery in South African law
Author: Ciresh Singh
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, pp 618-636 (2022 I4)
The tax burden of being unmarried: section 4(q) of the Estate Duty Act 45 of 1955
Authors: G Frantz and C Fritz
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, pp 637-656 (2022 I4)
Unauthorised use of images in memes: revisiting the privacy and identity debate
Author: N Mashinini
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, pp 657-670 (2022 I4)
A limitation on limitation? The Julian [discussion of MS “Bonanza” Schiffahrtgesellschaft Mbh & Co, KG v Durban Coal Terminal Company (Pty) Ltd t.a Bulk Connexions (A50/2017) 2018 ZAKZDHC 6 (29 March 2018)]
Author: Malcolm Wallis
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, pp 671-689 (2022 I4)
Common-law review, consensus and quantum leaps [discussion of Trustees for the time being of the Legacy Body Corporate v BAE Estates and Escapes (Pty) Ltd 2022 1 SA 424 (SCA)]
Author: DM Pretorius
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, pp 690-702 (2022 I4)
Re-thinking the “pillar paradigm” for sustainable development: An analysis of the Bo-Kaap Case reveals a shift to simple proportionality … and the fact that deference is not dead after all [discussion of Bo-Kaap Civic & Ratepayers Association v The City of Cape Town 2020 2 ALL SA 330 (SCA)]
Author: Lauren Kohn
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, pp 703-722 (2022 I4)
Hate speech and mass atrocities [discussion of Prosecutor v Vojislav Šešelj (Trial Chamber III) IT-03-67-T (31 March 2016)]
Author: Avitus A Agbor
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, pp 723-739 (2022 I4)