Money laundering through trade-finance instruments: A critical analysis of regulatory gaps and reform pathways under South African law: Part I

Money laundering through trade-finance instruments: A critical analysis of regulatory gaps and reform pathways under South African law: Part I

Authors: Tsanangurai Makuyana & WG Schulze

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Criminal and Procedural Law, University of South Africa; Professor Extraordinarius, Department of Mercantile Law, University of South Africa
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 38 Issue 1, 2026, p. 156 – 184
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v38/i1a7

Abstract

This article is the first of two articles on money laundering through trade-finance instruments. Its objective is to examine the problem of trade-based money laundering (‘TBML’) in trade finance under the South African anti-money laundering (‘AML’) regime. The articles seek to establish the level of preparedness of the South African AML authorities in dealing with the problem of TBML in the context of trade finance. The study also examines the legal and operational frameworks governing TBML in trade-finance instruments under South African law. Through a doctrinal analysis of statutes and financial regulations, coupled with a review of enforcement mechanisms, the article identifies systemic gaps in detection, reporting, and interagency coordination. The study further proposes prospects for reform, including leveraging on recent technological advancements, such as data analytics and artificial intelligence, as well as aligning with international best practices from the Financial Action Task Force (‘FATF’). By critically evaluating existing controls and proposing targeted interventions, this research contributes to policy debates on strengthening the South African AML regime in trade finance.

Unmasking money laundering risks in South Africa insolvency: Regulatory challenges and practitioner realities

Unmasking money laundering risks in South Africa insolvency: Regulatory challenges and practitioner realities

Author: Princess Ncube

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Senior Lecturer, Mercantile Law, University of Pretoria
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 38 Issue 1, 2026, p. 185 – 215
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v38/i1a8

Abstract

Money laundering poses significant threats to economic integrity, financial stability, and public confidence in South Africa, prompting comprehensive legislative responses through the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 (FICA) and the Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 (POCA). Despite this robust framework, the insolvency sector remains vulnerable and comparatively under-examined. This study critically evaluates the structural and procedural vulnerabilities within insolvency proceedings that may facilitate money laundering, highlighting regulatory gaps and practical challenges faced by insolvency practitioners. Insolvency in South Africa is primarily governed by the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936, and the Companies Act 71 of 2008, which prioritise creditor protection and asset distribution rather than explicit anti-money laundering (AML) safeguards. Consequently, insolvency processes may be exploited through fraudulent asset transfers, concealment of beneficial ownership, undervaluation of assets, and manipulation of creditor claims. Employing a doctrinal methodology, the paper analyses relevant legislation, regulatory materials, and academic literature, while examining practitioner experiences in complying with AML obligations. It identifies tensions between regulatory expectations and operational realities and proposes targeted reforms to enhance AML integration within insolvency practice, thereby strengthening South Africa’s broader financial crime framework.

The arbitrator’s duty to ensure procedural fairness and access to justice: Nombewu v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration & others (C564/2022) [2025] ZALCCT 30

The arbitrator’s duty to ensure procedural fairness and access to justice: Nombewu v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration & others (C564/2022) [2025] ZALCCT 30

Author: Judith Geldenhuys

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Senior Research Associate, University of Johannesburg
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 38 Issue 1, 2026, p. 216 – 235
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v38/i1a9

Abstract

None

Stringent application of the doctrine of common purpose during violent strikes in South Africa: When is an employee presumed to have associated himself in the Commission of the Act? Numsa OBO Aubrey Dhludhlu & 147 others v Marley Pipe Systems (SA) (Pty) Ltd [2022] ZACC 30

Stringent application of the doctrine of common purpose during violent strikes in South Africa: When is an employee presumed to have associated himself in the Commission of the Act? Numsa OBO Aubrey Dhludhlu & 147 others v Marley Pipe Systems (SA) (Pty) Ltd [2022] ZACC 30

Authors: Nkgolodishe Hermit Phaladi, Mulatedzi Ismael Maboho & Fortunate Kgahlego Mohlala

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Vaal University of Technology (VUT); Rosebank International (RI); Rosebank International (RI)
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 38 Issue 1, 2026, p. 236 – 252
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v38/i1a10

Abstract

None

The utilisation of ‘acting in the public interest’ in terms of s 157(1)(d) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 by third parties as a basis to bring legal proceedings against company directors: Vantage Mezzanine Fund II Partnership & another v Hopeson & others 2024 2 SA 550 (GJ)

The utilisation of ‘acting in the public interest’ in terms of s 157(1)(d) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 by third parties as a basis to bring legal proceedings against company directors: Vantage Mezzanine Fund II Partnership & another v Hopeson & others 2024 2 SA 550 (GJ)

Author: Delani Milton Mahhumane

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Senior Lecturer, University of South Africa
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 38 Issue 1, 2026, p. 253 – 272
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v38/i1a11

Abstract

None