Taxing Informality in Malawi: A Comparative Assessment of Policy Instruments and the Role of Digitalisation
Taxing Informality in Malawi: A Comparative Assessment of Policy Instruments and the Role of Digitalisation
Author: Waziona Ligomeka
ISSN: 2709-8575
Affiliations: Director in the Revenue Policy Division of the Ministry of Finance, Economic Planning and Decentralisation, Malawi
Source: African Multidisciplinary Tax Journal, Volume 6, Issue 1 (2026), p. 73–94
https://doi.org/10.47348/AMTJ/V6/i1a4
Abstract
Malawi faces sustained fiscal pressures stemming from reduced external assistance, recurring macroeconomic shocks and rising public debt. Strengthening domestic revenue mobilisation has therefore become a central policy priority. Although the informal economy accounts for a substantial share of employment and economic activity, it remains difficult to tax because many enterprises operate with low and irregular incomes, limited accounting records, cash-based transactions and weak visibility to tax authorities. This study comparatively examines five instruments used to tax and formalise informal economic activity in Malawi: advance income tax (AIT) on imports, the block management system (BMS), withholding tax (WHT), tax clearance certificates (TCCs) and presumptive tax. Using a qualitative comparative policy-analysis design, the study draws on legislation, Malawi Revenue Authority (MRA) publications, policy reports and academic literature. The instruments are assessed against four criteria: revenue mobilisation, administrative feasibility, compliance and formalisation outcomes, and long-term sustainability. The analysis suggests that indirect, transaction-based instruments, particularly WHT and AIT, are comparatively more effective than direct field-based approaches because they operate through observable transactions and third-party intermediaries. TCCs also provide a strong incentive for compliance by linking tax status to access to public procurement, importation, licensing and other regulated commercial opportunities. By contrast, BMS and presumptive tax have modest short-term revenue potential but remain important as mechanisms for taxpayer-discovery and simplified entry points into the tax system. Digitalisation can strengthen all five instruments by improving taxpayer identification, transaction traceability, data integration and risk-based enforcement. The study concludes that informal-sector taxation should be understood formalisation, rather than as an immediate mechanism for extracting substantial revenue from micro-enterprises.