The challenges in relation to undocumented abandoned children in South Africa

by | Oct 26, 2019 | TSAR, TSAR 2019 I1

The challenges in relation to undocumented abandoned children in South Africa

Authors Amanda Boniface, Whitney Rosenberg

ISSN: 1996-2207
Affiliations: Affiliated with the University of Johannesburg
Source: Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, Issue 1, 2019, p. 41 – 62

Abstract

DIE UITDAGINGS IN VERBAND MET ONGEDOKUMENTEERDE KINDERS IN SUID-AFRIKA ‘n Groot aantal kinders in Suid-Afrika val binne die kategorie van ongedokumenteerde kinders. Dit is hoofsaaklik as gevolg van Suid-Afrika se verouderde wetgewing in verband met burgerskap en die toepassing van hierdie wetgewing. Die impak van hierdie probleem strek verder as buitelanders en sluit ook Suid-Afrikaanse kinders in. In hierdie artikel ondersoek die outeurs die probleem deur die bepalings van die Kinderwet (Children’s Act) 38 van 2005, die geboorteregistrasieproses in Suid-Afrika en die implikasies van "veilige-hawe"-wette te analiseer. In die bydrae word verwys na Naki v Director-General: Department of Home Affairs waar die hof moes besluit of artikel 9 en 10 van die Wet op die Registrasie van Geboortes en Sterftes 51 van 1992 (en sub-regulasies (3) en (5) van regulasies 3, 4 en 5 en sub-regulasie (1) van regulasie 12) ge\xc3\xafnterpreteer moet word op ‘n manier wat effek gee aan die regte van kinders soos vervat in artikels 28(1) en (2) van die grondwet. Derhalwe het waarnemende regter Bodlani beveel dat die betrokke regulasies en sub-regulasies (te wete sub-regulasie (3)(f) en (i) en (5) tot regulasies 3, 4 en 5 sowel as sub-regulasie (i) van regulasie 12) ongrondwetlik is. Vergelykbare regsbepalings van die Verenigde State van Amerika, sowel as Duitsland, word ondersoek. Daarbenewens word die bepalings van verskeie internasionale konvensies wat verband hou met hierdie aangeleenthede aangeraak. Aanbevelings wat gemaak word, sluit in dat die Duitse reg, sowel as die wette van die Verenigde State van Amerika, goeie voorbeelde is van state wat beskerming verleen aan ongedokumenteerde kinders teen moontlike diskriminasie. Daar word aangevoer dat soortgelyke bepalings met vrug ook in Suid-Afrika gebruik kan word. Daar word ook voorgestel dat vermoede in die Duitse reg dat elke kind wel ‘n Duitse burger is, deur die Suid-Afrikaanse reg nagevolg behoort te word. Hierdie vermoede sou dus behels dat alle kinders wat in Suid-Afrika gebore word, veronderstel moet word om Suid-Afrikaanse burgers te wees, tensy die teenoorgestelde bewys word. Alternatiewelik word aangevoer dat ongedokumenteerde kinders, soos in die Verenigde State van Amerika, "Special Immigrant Juvenile Status" behoort te geniet en aldus op die regte van burgers aanspraak moet kan maak. Geen kind in Suid-Afrika behoort dus ongedokumenteer gelaat te word nie. Elke kind, ongeag sy of haar nasionaliteit, behoort die basiese regte wat gewaarborg word in die Suid-Afrikaanse grondwet te kan geniet en te kan afdwing.

Die soepelheid van die eiendomsbegrip in die trustreg

by | Oct 26, 2019 | TSAR, TSAR 2019 I1

Die soepelheid van die eiendomsbegrip in die trustreg

Authors MJ De Waal

ISSN: 1996-2207
Affiliations: Affiliated with the University of Stellenbosch
Source: Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, Issue 1, 2019, p. 25 – 40

Abstract

THE FLEXIBILITY OF THE OWNERSHIP CONCEPT IN THE LAW OF TRUSTS The trust as an institution that has developed in the common law and in some of the mixed legal systems (such as South Africa, Scotland and Quebec) is characterised by its pervasiveness in a wide range of personal and commercial contexts. This means that the trust in its true form can be employed in a wide range of contexts and for a variety of purposes, thus displaying what has been described as its "chameleon-like" quality. This contrasts with the trust in its "diluted" form (as frequently encountered in Continental Europe), which features some trust-like properties, but lacks the flexibility typically associated with the common-law trust as described above. It is argued that the flexibility of the trust in its true form is facilitated by, among others, the flexibility of the ownership concept in the law of trusts. In relation to the South African trust model, this phenomenon is illustrated in at least three specific areas of trust law. The first concerns the basic principle that, in civilian or mixed legal systems, the trust is not based on split ownership between the trustee and the trust beneficiary, but on the notion that the trustee owns assets in two separate estates (or patrimonies), that is, the trust estate and the trustee’s personal estate. Ownership in these two estates is treated in a remarkably flexible fashion — thus, for example, it enables the courts to craft new remedies in instances of so-called trust abuse. The second area concerns the very basic question as to where ownership must be vested in a trust. Here, South African law recognises a very peculiar trust type — the so-called bewind trust — under which ownership is vested not in the trustee, but in the trust beneficiary. This shift of ownership towards the trust beneficiary contributes to the flexibility of the trust institution and facilitates the use of trusts in new areas. The third area deals with the type of joint ownership that exists among co-trustees in a trust where there is more than one trustee (which is normally the case). In South Africa, the traditional forms of co-ownership do not explain the automatic transfer of ownership to co-trustees in the event of, for example, the death of one of the co-trustees. Research has shown that South African law has in this context probably accommodated the English law concept of joint tenancy, with its corollary of the rule of survivorship. This would explain what happens among co-trustees in the circumstances described and it once again illustrates the ability of the trust system to depart from established norms as far as the ownership concept is concerned. It nevertheless remains a challenge to explain the flexibility of the ownership concept in the law of trusts. In South Africa, this is sometimes done by attaching certain labels to the trustee’s ownership, such as "bare ownership", "ex officio ownership" or even "legal ownership". Other attempts have focused on the concept of "fiduciary ownership", unpacking it in the context of trusts. However, an extremely useful insight has been that provided by those authors who have argued that the common law has been able to accommodate the trust in its "true" form because of its "anti-conceptual" approach to property or, put differently, "its power to break fundamental rules of the legal system within which it operates". It is argued that South African law has shown the capacity to do exactly this with regard to its treatment of ownership in the law of trusts. This capacity has probably been facilitated by the fact that the English common-law trust was initially received into South African law, but later transformed in a pragmatic (and typically common-law) case-by-case fashion to align itself with well-known civilian institutions already recognised in the system.

The expansion of the state’s liability for harm arising from medical malpractice

by | Oct 26, 2019 | TSAR, TSAR 2019 I1

The expansion of the state’s liability for harm arising from medical malpractice

Authors AB Wessels

ISSN: 1996-2207
Affiliations: Affiliated with the University of Stellenbosch
Source: Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, Issue 1, 2019, p. 1 – 24

Abstract

DIE UITDYENDE STAATSAANSPREEKLIKHEID VIR SKADE VOORTSPRUITEND UIT MEDIESE WANPRAKTYKE: ONDERLIGGENDE REDES, NADELIGE GEVOLGE EN POTENSI\xc3\x8bLE HERVORMING Suid-Afrika het nie ‘n statut\xc3\xaare vergoedingskema vir skade wat voorspruit uit mediese wanpraktyke nie. Slagoffers wat in hierdie konteks skade ly, moet gemeenregtelike deliktuele of kontraktuele eise in ‘n siviele hof instel in ‘n poging om vergoeding te verkry. Hulle word nie bygestaan deur ‘n omkering van die bewyslas nie en dus moet hulle alle elemente van aanspreeklikheid op ‘n oorwig van waarskynlikheid bewys. Hulle kan die eis instel teen die persoon wat verantwoordelik is vir hul skade, of hulle kan probeer om laasgenoemde se werkgewer middellik aanspreeklik te hou. Dit blyk dat die meeste slagoffers deliktuele verrigtinge instel teen die werkgewer van die persoon wat hul skade op skuldige en onregmatige wyse veroorsaak het. Ten spyte daarvan dat die eiser deur besondere uitdagings in die gesig gestaar word in sover dit die bewys van feitelike kousaliteit en nalatigheid aangaan, sien ons in die afgelope dekade ‘n beduidende toename in mediese wanpraktyk-litigasie. Daarmee saam kan ‘n merkwaardige uitbreiding van staatsaanspreeklikheid waargeneem word vir skade wat voortspruit uit mediese wanpraktyke in die openbare gesondheidsorgsektor. Teen hierdie agtergrond is die Suid-Afrikaanse Regshervormingskommissie aangewys om moontlike hervormingsmoontlikhede te ondersoek. Die kommissie het ‘n reeks moontlike hervormingsopsies ge\xc3\xafdentifiseer, maar het nie ‘n finale, afsluitende aanbeveling in hierdie verband gemaak nie. Die tussentydse voorstel vir die wysiging van die Wet op Staatsaanspreeklikheid, wat hoofsaaklik daarop gemik is om gestruktureerde skikkings moontlik te maak, is aan die nasionale vergadering voorgel\xc3\xaa, maar dit is nog nie bekragtig nie. Hierdie artikel evalueer hierdie hervormingsopsies, asook die moontlikheid van geregtelike hervorming van die reg aangaande aanspreeklikheid voortvloeiend uit mediese wanpraktyke.