The nature and features of ‘unused old order rights’ under the MPRDA revisited: The story of Gouws’ farm

The nature and features of ‘unused old order rights’ under the MPRDA revisited: The story of Gouws’ farm

Author: Pieter Badenhorst

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: Associate Professor of Law, Deakin University; Honorary Professor of Law, Nelson Mandela University
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 138 Issue 3, p. 599-616
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v138/i3a7

Abstract

This article examines the nature and features of ‘unused old order rights’ (‘UOORs’) under item 8 of Schedule II of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 in light of the recent decision by the Constitutional Court in Magnificent Mile Trading 30 (Pty) Ltd v Celliers 2020 (4) SA 375 (CC). At issue was: (a) whether an UOOR was transmissible to heirs upon the death of its holder; and (b) the applicability of the Oudekraal principle to the award of an unlawful prospecting right to an applicant, contrary to the rights enjoyed by the holder of an UOOR. The article analyses the constituent elements of an UOOR, rights ancillary to the UOOR’s and the nature and features of UOORs and ancillary rights. The article also considers the possible loss of an UOOR by application of the Oudekraal principle due to the unlawful grant of a prospecting right by the state, as custodian of mineral resources. The article illustrates that the CC ensured in Magnificent Mile that the Oudekraal principle does not undermine the security of tenure and statutory priority afforded to holders of UOORs by ultra vires grants of inconsistent rights to opportunistic applicants. Concern is also expressed about the poor administration of mineral resources by the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy.

A critique on privately prosecuting the holder of ‘after the fact’ environmental authorisations: Uzani Environmental Advocacy CC v BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd

A critique on privately prosecuting the holder of ‘after the fact’ environmental authorisations: Uzani Environmental Advocacy CC v BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd

Author: Melissa Strydom

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: LLB (UJ) LLM (Wits), PhD candidate, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 138 Issue 3, p. 617-648
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v138/i3a8

Abstract

There has been much debate about ‘after the fact’ environmental authorisations and the ability to privately prosecute environmental-law offences in South Africa. These two issues came to a head in Uzani Environmental Advocacy CC v BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd. This case is the first known private prosecution of environmental-law contraventions in South Africa. BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd (‘BPSA’) was privately prosecuted for constructing filling stations without environmental authorisations, allegedly between 1998 and 2005. BPSA submitted ‘rectification’ applications in 2005, paid administrative fines, and was issued with ‘after the fact’ environmental authorisations. Nevertheless, in 2019 BPSA was convicted for contravening the related environmental-law requirement. This article discusses the applicable legislative context, the complex and frequently changing environmental laws, and their interpretation and application in a criminal context. Criticisms of the Uzani judgment include that the court did not sufficiently deliberate or determine the applicable law at the time of the offences for which BPSA was indicted; the public or environmental interest served by the private prosecution; strict liability in relation to the offence; policy and other considerations for not prosecuting these offences; constitutionality and admissibility of the evidence; and the potentially far-reaching consequences of such prosecutions. These issues all act as reminders of the importance of clear and precise legislative drafting, and contextual interpretation.

On equating ‘mays’ with ‘musts’: When can a discretionary power be interpreted as a mandatory one?

On equating ‘mays’ with ‘musts’: When can a discretionary power be interpreted as a mandatory one?

Author: Lisa Draga

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: Lecturer, School of Law, University of the Western Cape, LLB (Western Cape) LLM (University of Missouri, Columbia)
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 138 Issue 3, p. 649-681
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v138/i3a9

Abstract

In this article I investigate when the otherwise permissive term ‘may’ in an empowering provision can be interpreted as imposing a duty on the recipient of that power to act. In the first part, I examine our courts’ pre-democratic approach to answering this question through an analysis of pre-democratic judgments. In particular, I scrutinise certain factors that the courts have traditionally relied on in this regard. Thereafter, I consider the present-day rules of statutory interpretation and its application to the may/must question. Next, I analyse the Constitutional Court’s approach to determining when the use of ‘may’ to confer a power through statute can be interpreted as requiring the power be exercised. I undertake an analysis of a dissection of relevant Constitutional Court judgments. These judgments are dissected for purposes of illustrating the continued relevance of the traditional factors that were employed before democracy. Finally, I focus on the may/must question in the typical public-law context of this interpretative exercise. I examine potential grounds of review where the holder of the power has failed or refused to execute a duty attached to permissive language. I also consider separation-of-powers concerns that may likely arise.

Working against violence against women: How far have we come?

Working against violence against women: How far have we come?

Authors Nolundi Luwaya and Jameelah Omar

ISSN: 1996-2088
Affiliations: BA LLB LLM (UCT); Director, Land and Accountability Research Unit, University of Cape Town; LLB LLM (UCT); Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Law, University of Cape Town
Source: Acta Juridica, 2020, p. 1 – 26

Abstract

This article is the framing chapter of this collection of articles. It discusses violence against women through the lens of the three main themes that also run through the collection. The first theme focuses on sexual violence as a particular manifestation of violence against women. The second theme includes a discussion of legal and policy discourses of violence in international and regional law, as well as the challenges faced by women at the margins of society. The final theme addresses the difficulties for women who work against violence against women, whether as scholars or practitioners, and considers the toll and costs associated with doing this work. The discussion of these themes is used to both acknowledge the systematic nature of these challenges and to problematise the challenges, by reflecting on the repeated violences, acknowledging new(er) manifestations, and asking probing questions about how trends in public outrage can impact on legal, policy and practice developments.

Villains and (s)heroes in the quest for truth and justice in sexual harassment cases

Villains and (s)heroes in the quest for truth and justice in sexual harassment cases

Author Nicolette Naylor

ISSN: 1996-2088
Affiliations: BProc LLB (University of the Western Cape), LLM International Human Rights (University of London).
Source: Acta Juridica, 2020, p. 27 – 62

Abstract

Sexual harassment is rooted in structures and patterns of patriarchy, power and discrimination. The law requires employers to address the root causes of sexual harassment to prevent and protect all employees. When the law intervenes to remedy sexual harassment, the disciplinary rules and procedures set out in the law of sexual harassment can victimise or vindicate both complainants and perpetrators. The law can also legitimise toxic workplace cultures when it directs all its focus on individual perpetrators and complainants, as opposed to interrogating broader organisational cultures that may create a toxic environment in which sexual harassment can thrive. This article explores the limitations of the individualised, adversarial approach to discipline and offers guidance for reimagining what justice and accountability could look like in cases of sexual harassment, through an analysis of the Equal Education sexual harassment inquiry process and outcome.

Tribunal justice may be meaning ful to lawyers drafting legal documents … amid the smoldering embers of destroyed communities. But little satisfaction will come to survivors … the voices of survivors will remain largely unheard and unaddressed.

A contradiction in terms? The promotion of adolescent sexual rights and the prevention of sexual violence

A contradiction in terms? The promotion of adolescent sexual rights and the prevention of sexual violence

Author Salona Lutchman

ISSN: 1996-2088
Affiliations: LLB (UKZN) LLM (New York) PhD Candidate (UCT); Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Law, University of Cape Town; Attorney and Notary of the High Court of South Africa.
Source: Acta Juridica, 2020, p. 63 – 86

Abstract

This article is a contribution to the ongoing national discourse on adolescent sexuality. By juxtaposing adolescent sexuality with the high levels of adolescent sexual violence, the article seeks to highlight the tensions and challenges embedded in the current protectionist narrative. The article argues that adolescent sexual violence has a gendered dimension, with girls being the dominant victims and boys the dominant perpetrators. However, in order to understand adolescent sexual violence, one has to first understand the missing discourse, which is adolescent sexuality. It is argued that constructive approaches geared towards curbing adolescent sexual violence should deal with the inherent gender inequality embedded in adolescent sexual agency and violence.