Law students and freedom of expression: An empirical case study

by | Oct 19, 2019 | SAJHR, SAJHR V28 I1

Law students and freedom of expression: An empirical case study

Authors Victoria Bronstein, Daryl Glaser, Merle Werbeloff

ISSN: 1996-2126
Affiliations: University of the Witwatersrand
Source: South African Journal on Human Rights, Volume 28 Issue 1, 2012, p. 55 – 80

Abstract

Against a background of rhetorical and potential legal assaults on freedom of information and media freedom in South Africa, the authors set out to investigate levels of support for freedom of expression amongst law students at the University of the Witwatersrand. The findings were mixed, with evidence that students strongly support generic pro-freedom of expression statements but that their support buckles when confronted with hard cases, such as satirical Zapiro cartoons. While students give weak support to political freedom of expression directed at the government, they are outrightly hostile to citizen-on-citizen offensive speech, many being willing to contemplate bans. Final-year students show up as somewhat more supportive of political freedom of expression than first-year students, while white students across both years are somewhat more supportive of freedom of expression than black students. There is however considerable diversity of views amongst black students and some evidence that racial differences in support for freedom of expression are influenced by attitudes to the current government. The results add to other evidence suggesting that supporters of freedom of expression in South Africa may not be able to call upon consistent or robust elite and popular support in resisting repressive government moves.

Autologous stem cell therapy: An analysis of the South African regulatory regime

by | Oct 19, 2019 | SAJHR, SAJHR V28 I1

Autologous stem cell therapy: An analysis of the South African regulatory regime

Authors Donrich W Jordaan

ISSN: 1996-2126
Affiliations: Co-founder and managing director of Sylvean Biotech; Research Associate, Intellectual Property Law Research Unit, University of Cape Town
Source: South African Journal on Human Rights, Volume 28 Issue 1, 2012, p. 31 – 54

Abstract

This article analyses the regulation of autologous stem cell (ASC) therapy in South Africa. The analysis is structured in three parts: In the first part of the analysis it is argued that ASC preparations qualify qua registrable medicine in the subclass of biological medicine within the regulatory framework established by the Medicines and Related Substances Control Act (Medicines Act). In the second part of the analysis it is argued that ASC therapy is indeed subject to regulation, primarily in terms of the regulatory framework established by the Medicines Act that effectively requires an ASC therapy to pass the rigorous test of clinical trials before it may be prescribed or supplied to a patient. It is further argued that there exist various layers of additional regulatory rules — some from the regulatory framework established by the Medicines Act and some from the regulatory framework established by the Human Tissue Act — pertaining to the harvesting, storage and preparation activities of the ASC therapy process. In the third part of the analysis a possible human rights challenge to the regulation of ASC therapy is explored: an argument is developed that employs the right to control one’s own body to argue for special exemption of ASC therapy based on its autologous nature that differentiates it from mass-produced medicine. With reference to case law, it is argued that such challenge will fail. Finally, it is argued that the system of clinical trials that is core to the current regulation of medicine in general and ASC therapy in particular is aligned with human dignity. It is therefore concluded that ASC therapy is not only comprehensively regulated in South Africa, but also that the current regulatory regime is for the public good and aligned with our country’s commitment to human rights.

Towards an ethical relation to the nonhuman other: Deconstruction, veganism and the law

by | Oct 19, 2019 | SAJHR, SAJHR V28 I1

Towards an ethical relation to the nonhuman other: Deconstruction, veganism and the law

Authors Jan-Harm De Villiers

ISSN: 1996-2126
Affiliations: University of Pretoria
Source: South African Journal on Human Rights, Volume 28 Issue 1, 2012, p. 18 – 30

Abstract

This article explores the ethical significance of deconstruction for law and advances veganism as a form of deconstruction that exposes and resists the anthropocentric character of social and legal configurations. The article engages with Jacques Derrida’s project of deconstructing the (human) subject and draws on Drucilla Cornell’s reconception of deconstruction as the philosophy of the limit. By examining the philosophical foundations of justice and deconstruction, the article exposes justice as the limit to a system of law and investigates the capacity of deconstruction to advance the ethical relation (to the nonhuman Other).

Promoting rights through court-based ADR?

by | Oct 19, 2019 | SAJHR, SAJHR V28 I1

Promoting rights through court-based ADR?

Authors Laurence Boulle

ISSN: 1996-2126
Affiliations: Director of the Mandela Institute and Issy Wolfson Professor of Law, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Source: South African Journal on Human Rights, Volume 28 Issue 1, 2012, p. 1 – 17

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which mediation and ADR can be used to modernise civil litigation in South Africa in line with comparable developments in other jurisdictions. It does so in the context of Amartya Sen’s theory of justice, based on individuals’ capacity to order their lives, and of contemporary access to justice notions relating to court procedures. Through a fictional case study on court-based ADR in a franchise dispute the article explores ways in which a regulatory framework can accommodate ADR in case management systems and delineates some of the institutional requirements for such an arrangement. It makes a proposal along these lines, and evaluates it in terms of Sen’s theory and other justice norms.