Insecurity and economic marginalisation in Marsabit County

Insecurity and economic marginalisation in Marsabit County

Author Muthoni Nyuguto

ISSN: 2521-2613
Affiliations: TBC
Source: Africa Nazarene University Law Journal, 2020, Volume 8, Issue 1, p. 199 – 211
https://doi.org/10.47348/ANULJ/v8/i1a9

Abstract

Ten years after the inauguration of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, the communities of Marsabit County are still living on the periphery of society. They remain systemically excluded from the nation’s mainstream social, political, economic, and cultural activities. Communities living within the North Frontier Districts (as it was known then) and within the Counties of Mandera, Wajir, Garissa, Isiolo and Marsabit are still considered ‘hostile tribes’ by the ruling elite since colonialisation and are treated as such. The colonial government enforced this isolation by enacting a series of Ordinances between the years 1901 to 1933 that systemically isolated and marginalised communities from this geographical area. The Ordinances largely criminalised the community’s main economic activity of pastoralism by allowing arbitral seizure and detainment as well as collective punishment for offences of members of the community. This negative and suspicious perception, systemic exclusion by the laws and policies, condensed economic activities limited to pastoralism, political under-representation, poverty, distance and inaccessibility have exacerbated the marginalisation of the communities living within Marsabit to date. Unfortunately, independence did not liberate these communities within the Northern Frontier Districts from systemic exclusion. They were still treated as a ‘special group’ within the context of section 19 of the Kenya Independence Order in Council. This section provides for the modification, qualifications and exceptions of laws and policies to be applied in respect of these communities. The state felt there was a need to subject these communities to screening, profiling, and overregulation in these areas in comparison to the rest of the nation. State institutions were further unable and unwilling to penetrate these areas. The application of different laws to these communities was carried forward during the post-independence where the Presidency was granted the power to govern these communities by decree. Despite the goodwill of the Constitution 2010 to reduce the levels of marginalisation within this county, there is a need to carry out a case study to assess whether the current legal, political, social and economic frameworks have reduced marginalisation within Marsabit which has been for a long time an ungoverned territory.

A fundamental law of reason and the constitutional law of elections in Africa

A fundamental law of reason and the constitutional law of elections in Africa

Author: Atudiwe P. Atupare

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: BA, LLB (UG), M.A. (Brock), LLM, PhD (Queen’s University).
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 8 Issue 1, p. 1 – 41
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v8/i1a1

Abstract

This paper attempts a comparative understanding of the constitutional law of elections in two African countries: Ghana and Nigeria. As a prelude, I argue that judges should approach the task of interpretation of the constitutional law of elections based on a non-positivist understanding of legality or the rule of law. Law is not to be regarded simply as the product of lawmakers’ decisions and intentions but as embodying fundamental values that gain normative force independently of what is decided, written or intended by lawmakers. The core of this claim is anchored on a theory of law, the fundamental law of reason. The identification of this fundamental law is not a matter of pure moral reasoning. It is a conception of law as a rule of reason with ‘reason’ here suggesting a uniquely judicial form of discourse where the particular values that will, under this approach, gain this special normative force cannot be listed in a fixed catalogue; they are, rather, the values that are deemed essential to securing the conditions for legality or the rule of law that are, in turn, necessary for ‘law’ to exist. In light of this, I contend that judicial decisions on electoral disputes in Ghana and Nigeria should be able to carry conviction with the ordinary person as being based not merely on legal precedent or the law-makers’ intentions but also upon acceptable values as understood from the reason of the fundamental law.

Selected challenges associated with the reliance on customer due diligence measures to curb money laundering in South African banks and related financial institutions

Selected challenges associated with the reliance on customer due diligence measures to curb money laundering in South African banks and related financial institutions

Authors: Howard Chitimira and Sharon Munedzi

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: LLB, LLM (UFH), LLD (NMMU). Research Professor and Professor of Securities and Financial Markets Law, Faculty of Law, North-West University; LLB, LLM (NWU), LLD candidate, Faculty of Law, North-West University. 
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 8 Issue 1, p. 42 – 66
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v8/i1a2

Abstract

Customer due diligence is a means of ensuring that financial institutions know their customers well through know-your-customer (KYC) tools and related measures. Notably, customer due diligence measures include the identification and verification of customer identity, keeping records of transactions concluded between a customer and the financial institution, ongoing monitoring of customer account activities, reporting unusual and suspicious transactions, and risk assessment programmes. Accordingly, financial institutions should ensure that their customers are risk assessed before concluding any transactions with them. The regulation of money laundering is crucial to the economic growth of many countries, including South Africa. However, there are still numerous challenges affecting the banks and other role players’ reliance on customer due diligence measures to combat money laundering in South Africa. Therefore, a qualitative research methodology is employed in this article to unpack such challenges. The challenges include the failure to meet the identification and verification requirements by some South African citizens, onerous documentation requirements giving rise to other persons being denied access to the formal financial sector, and the lack of express provisions to regulate the informal financial sector in South Africa. Given this background, the article discusses the challenges associated with the regulation and implementation of customer due diligence measures to enhance the combating of money laundering in South African banks and related financial institutions. It is hoped that the recommendations provided in this article will be utilised by the relevant authorities to enhance customer due diligence and effectively combat money laundering activities in South African banks and related financial institutions.

States of emergency and the rule of law under contemporary African constitutions: A comparative analysis

States of emergency and the rule of law under contemporary African constitutions: A comparative analysis

Author: Lukman Adebisi Abdulrauf

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: Senior lecturer, Department of Public Law, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 8 Issue 1, p. 67 – 101
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v8/i1a3

Abstract

Emergencies, whether natural or man-made, are inevitable in contemporary societies. Although the nature and magnitude of such emergencies are usually unpredictable, governments across the world must adopt measures to mitigate and control the emergency while securing the lives and properties of the people. Since emergencies envisage exceptional circumstances, there may be the need for the suspension of the normal legal order and its temporary replacement with an extraordinary regime to help restore the normal legal order. During the subsistence of the extraordinary regime, the question that has always concerned modern-day constitutionalists is how the rule of law can be maintained in such a regime which is characterised by the suspension of the normal legal order. This concern is even more apparent in Africa considering the general attitude of political leaders who will want to take advantage of every opportunity to abuse human rights, consolidate powers and remain in government. All these concerns therefore centre on the nature and scope of state of emergency provisions in constitutions and their implementation. Therefore, in this article, I will comparatively analyse the nature and scope of state of emergency provisions under modern African constitutions to determine the extent to which they are inclusive and embrace the basic tenets of the rule of law. I will further interrogate the applicability of the rule of law in states of emergency using recent practices in selected African countries.

Companies convicted of economic crimes and their participation in government tender processes in South Africa: A comment on Namasthethu electrical (PTY) LTD v City of Cape Town and another (201/19) [2020] ZASCA 74 (29 JUNE 2020)

Companies convicted of economic crimes and their participation in government tender processes in South Africa: A comment on Namasthethu electrical (PTY) LTD v City of Cape Town and another (201/19) [2020] ZASCA 74 (29 JUNE 2020)

Author: Jamil Ddamulira Mujuzi

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, University of the Western Cape.
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 8 Issue 1, p. 102 – 122
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v8/i1a4

Abstract

In South Africa, persons or companies convicted of fraud or corruption or companies whose directors have been convicted are debarred from participating in bidding for government tenders. Although it is easy to establish whether or not a natural person has been convicted of an offence, because a certificate can be obtained from the South African Police Service to that effect, it is the opposite with juristic persons. This issue came up in the case of Namasthethu Electrical (Pty) Ltd v City of Cape Town and Another in which the appellant company was awarded a government tender although the company and its former director had been convicted of fraud and corruption. The purpose of this article is to analyse this judgment and show the challenges that the government is faced with when dealing with companies that have been convicted of offences that bid for government tenders. Because South Africa is in the process of enacting public procurement legislation, the Public Procurement Bill was published for comment in early 2020. One of the issues addressed in the Bill relates to debarring bidders who have been convicted of some offences from bidding for government tenders. Based on the facts of this case and legislation from other African countries, the author suggests ways in which the provisions of the Bill could be strengthened to address this issue.

Book Review: Jurisprudence: Theory and context 8 ed by Brian Bix, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2019

Book Review: Jurisprudence: Theory and context 8 ed by Brian Bix, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2019

Author: Edmund Ato Kwaw

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, University of the Western Cape.
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 8 Issue 1, p. 123 – 126
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v8/i1a5

Abstract

None

The Economy in the Constitution: An Appraisal of Kenya’s 2010 Constitution as an Economic Charter

The Economy in the Constitution: An Appraisal of Kenya’s 2010 Constitution as an Economic Charter

Author: Eric Kibet

ISSN: 2521-5434
Affiliations: LLD (Pretoria), LLM (Boston College), LLB (Nairobi), Advocate of the High Court of Kenya and Assistant Professor, United States International University, Nairobi, Kenya
Source: Africa Journal of Comparative Constitutional Law, 2020, p. 1 – 30
https://doi.org/10.47348/AJCL/2020/a1

Abstract

The idea of constitutions as instruments of political governance or ‘power maps’ is well established. Constitutions set down the foundation for political governance, establish organs of the state, allocate them power, define their relationships inter se, and most importantly, limit public power. The conception of constitutions as instruments of economic governance has not received as much scholarly attention. The lack of constitutionalism and rule of law has tended to coexist with poor economic prospects in Kenya and elsewhere in Africa, suggesting a link between them. This has made the question of whether constitutions and the idea of constitutionalism can contribute to better economic governance besides political governance, more important. While it cannot be assumed that the stipulations in a constitution on economic governance automatically translate into good governance and economic growth, such provisions are nonetheless important as they provide an encouraging impetus for sound economic governance that is indispensable in achieving growth and development. This article appraises Kenya’s Constitution as an economic charter that dedicates significant attention to regulating economic affairs through setting a foundation for the country’s economic orientation, protecting private property and enterprise, securing the rule of law and good governance, including economic governance, and making provisions on other economic concerns such as labour relations, consumer protection and competition.

The Role of Founding Values and Principles in Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation: Lessons for Zimbabwe

The Role of Founding Values and Principles in Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation: Lessons for Zimbabwe

Author: Admark Moyo and Basutu S Makwaiba

ISSN: 2521-5434
Affiliations: None
Source: Africa Journal of Comparative Constitutional Law, 2020, p. 31 – 58
https://doi.org/10.47348/AJCL/2020/a2

Abstract

This article explores the role of constitutional values and principles in statutory and constitutional analysis. Given that the exact meaning of these values and principles remains largely unexplored, the article starts by explaining the differences between these terms and argues that these differences are not important for purposes of determining the role of values and principles in the interpretation of legal texts. In addition, the article examines the meaning and scope of the teleological theory of interpretation which forms the philosophical basis of a value-laden approach to constitutional and statutory analysis. More importantly, the article proceeds to unpack the letter and reach of the constitutional provisions that explicitly require courts to pay due regard to values and principles when interpreting any part of the Declaration of Rights. Towards the end, the article demonstrates the role of values in both the interpretation of enactments and the development of the common law or customary law.

An Evaluation of the Enforcement of Fundamental Rights and the Controversy of Jurisdiction of the Federal and State High Courts in Nigeria

An Evaluation of the Enforcement of Fundamental Rights and the Controversy of Jurisdiction of the Federal and State High Courts in Nigeria

Author: Bo Alloh

ISSN: 2521-5434
Affiliations: LLB, LLM, BL, PhD, Lecturer, Acting Head, Department of Jurisprudence and International Law, Faculty of Law, Delta State University, Oleh Campus, Delta State, Nigeria.
Source: Africa Journal of Comparative Constitutional Law, 2020, p. 59 – 78
https://doi.org/10.47348/AJCL/2020/a3

Abstract

This article examines the issue of jurisdiction between various high courts on the enforcement of fundamental rights in Nigeria. Fundamental rights are derived from the constitution and are expressly entrenched in the constitution of a country. They vary from one country to another and are specifically enacted in a country’s constitution in line with the history and culture of the country. In Nigeria, jurisdiction is vested in both State and Federal High Courts with respect to the enforcement of fundamental rights. However, the jurisdiction of the State High Courts is ousted and donated to the Federal High Courts, once a case on fundamental rights falls under section 251 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The researcher adopted the doctrinal method of research. The objective of this article is to reveal that the concurrent jurisdiction of both the Federal and State High Courts to hear and determine applications to secure the enforcement of fundamental rights has led to years of seemingly unsettled controversies, academically and procedurally. However, this controversy has been settled in the case of FUT Minna v Olutayo. This article concludes that the Supreme Court decision in the case of FUT Minna v Olutayo supports the realisation of the enforcement of fundamental rights in Nigeria.

A Reflection on Issues involved in the Exercise of the Power of the Attorney-General to enter A Nolle Prosequi under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria

A Reflection on Issues involved in the Exercise of the Power of the Attorney-General to enter A Nolle Prosequi under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria

Author: Dr Andrew Ejovwo Abuza

ISSN: 2521-5434
Affiliations: B.Sc (Hons); PGDE; MSc; LLB (Hons); LLM ; Ph.D (Law) and Teachers Registration Council of Nigeria (TRCN) Certificate of Registration as a certified teacher. Senior Lecturer, Acting Head of Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, Delta State University, Abraka (Oleh Campus), Nigeria and Principal of the Law firm of Abuza & Associates.
Source: Africa Journal of Comparative Constitutional Law, 2020, p. 79 – 109
https://doi.org/10.47348/AJCL/2020/a4

Abstract

The 1999 Nigerian Constitution bestows on the Attorney-General the power to enter a nolle prosequi in criminal proceedings. This paper reflects on issues involved in the exercise of the constitutional power of nolle prosequi. The research methodology adopted is mainly doctrinal analysis of applicable primary and secondary sources. The paper finds that the exercise of the constitutional power of nolle prosequi for self-interest or political considerations of the Attorney-General is unconstitutional. The paper suggests the subjection of the exercise of the constitutional power of nolle prosequi to the permission of the court in line with the practice in other countries like the United States of America (USA) and Kenya.