Caveat subscriptor, the consumer-friendly approach: An analysis of Van Wyk v UPS SCS South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Author Tshepiso Scott
Affiliations: Lecturer, Department of Mercantile Law, University of Pretoria
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 137 Issue 4, p. 625-640
Prior to the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (‘CPA’), the consumer in South Africa was without substantive protection when concluding contracts with suppliers. This case note explores how the CPA has changed this position by the introduction of information-disclosure requirements in terms of s 49 of the Act (‘notice required for certain terms and conditions’) and the important link to s 22 of the Act, which affords the consumer the right to information in plain and understandable language. The recent judgment in Van Wyk v UPS SCS (Pty) Ltd  1 All SA 857 (WCC) is a long-awaited decision that provides clarity on aspects of the disclosure requirements that have been prescribed by the Act.