Quel régime pour l’imprévision en droit Mauricien des contrats ? Les leçons à tirer de la réforme du droit Français des obligations en 2016

by | Feb 15, 2026 | JCLA, JCLA V12 I2 2025

Quel régime pour l’imprévision en droit Mauricien des contrats ? Les leçons à tirer de la réforme du droit Français des obligations en 2016

Author: Goran Georgijevic

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: Senior Lecturer (Civil Law), Law Department, Faculty of Law and Management, University of Mauritius
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 12 Issue 2, p. 199–219
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v12/i2a7

Abstract

The general rule on unforeseeability, incorporated into Article 1195 of the French Civil Code, is relatively new, dating back only to 2016. The doctrinal and jurisprudential position in France concerning the theoretical justification of this institution, its imperativeness, the conditions for taking unforeseeability into account, and the reaction of the law to it can be a rich source of learning for the Mauritian legislator when the time comes to regulate contractual unforeseeability in the Mauritian Civil Code.

La protection juridique des personnes handicapées en matière de droit du travail au Cameroun : entre inclusion et exclusion

by | Feb 15, 2026 | JCLA, JCLA V12 I2 2025

La protection juridique des personnes handicapées en matière de droit du travail au Cameroun : entre inclusion et exclusion

Author: Hako Mbouendeu Marie Solange

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: Enseignante au département de droit privé fondamental de la faculté des sciences juridiques et politiques de l’Université de Douala-Cameroun
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 12 Issue 2, p. 220–245
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v12/i2a8

Abstract

People with disabilities, like all human beings, have the right to dignity and to enjoy a full life, including the right to work. Their legal protection in terms of labour law in Cameroon lies somewhere between inclusion and exclusion. The Cameroonian legislature has adopted a policy of positive discrimination in favour of persons with disabilities, consisting of preferential measures in terms of recruitment and job retention. The intended effect is to restore the balance between able-bodied and disabled workers, most of whom have had a difficult educational background. However, in Cameroon, as in several sub-Saharan African countries, the government’s objectives of economic emergence and the creation of a more just and inclusive society are struggling to materialise; the experiences of persons with disabilities, affected by challenges and vulnerabilities, illustrate this. The reality regarding the protection of persons with disabilities in labour law is sad. Beyond the texts, which enshrine the commendable efforts of Cameroonian legislators, the implementation of this policy is limited, if not non-existent in practice. In short, the inclusive professional integration of persons with disabilities seems to have a long way to go.

Opinion: rethinking PFPAD: reflections from the third general session, for the African diaspora

by | Feb 15, 2026 | JCLA, JCLA V12 I2 2025

Opinion: rethinking PFPAD: reflections from the third general session, for the African diaspora

Author: Chinaza K. Asiegbu

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: J.D. 2025, Harvard Law School; Graduate Associate, Centre for History and Economics, Harvard University; Fellow, Human Rights Program, Harvard Law School
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 12 Issue 2, p. 246–272
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v12/i2a9

Abstract

Emerging from a legacy of United Nations interventions on racism dating back to 1950, the Permanent Forum for People of African Descent (PFPAD) is a freshly minted mechanism, established in 2021. Despite its promise, and perhaps because of its novelty, PFPAD risks undermining the well-founded hopes invested in it: namely, due to a lack of a clear mission. Drawing on participant observation at the Third General Session, this article presents a critical legal and institutional analysis, arguing that the Forum remains caught in a cycle of performative politics, elite disconnection, and institutional inertia – epitomised by the ratification of a Second International Decade for People of African Descent. The analysis further identifies a diaspora gap, analysing the counter-productive dissociation between African and African-descendant identities which sidelines the continent and fractures pan-African solidarity. To realise its potential, the article contends, PFPAD must pivot from symbolism to substance by prioritising a single, concrete legal objective: the completion of the Declaration on the Human Rights of People of African Descent. This process is currently hampered by a procedural disconnect between the drafting Intergovernmental Working Group and the Forum’s public general sessions. Finally, the article advances a three-part blueprint for the PFPAD to build public value: 1) reconceptualising reparations as sustainable capacity-building rather than a onetime payout; 2) grounding PFPAD’s work in local action, including relocating its sessions to Africa and the Caribbean; and 3) leveraging comparative regional legal models, from CARICOM to the AfCFTA, to create a self-reliant, legally fortified, and truly unified global African diaspora.