VAT Apportionment: BGR 16 and Distributions from Trusts

VAT Apportionment: BGR 16 and Distributions from Trusts

Author: Des Kruger

ISSN: 2219-1585
Affiliations: N/A
Source: Business Tax & Company Law Quarterly, Volume 16 Issue 2, 2025, p. 16 – 24

Abstract

A vendor engaged in making both taxable and non-taxable supplies may only claim input tax relief in respect of all the goods and services acquired by the vendor to the extent that such goods or services are utilised by the vendor to make taxable supplies. To the extent that the relevant goods and services are utilised by the vendor for the dual purpose of making taxable and non-taxable supplies, the vendor is required to apportion the input tax in accordance with the apportionment ratio prescribed by SARS. The apportionment ratio is prescribed by SARS in Binding General Ruling 16 (BGR 16).
Simply put, the ratio is the value taxable supplies divided by the value of all other supplies or non-supplies made by the vendor. The denominator specifically includes interest (exempt), dividends (out of scope) and capital gains derived on the supply of capital assets. BGR 16 provides for certain exclusions (capital gains derived on the supply of capital goods) and so-called adjustments in other cases, including in relation to interest and dividends. While capital gains are excluded entirely, interest must be included as follows, interest received/accrued × (prime rate – JIBAR), and dividends on the following basis, namely 3-year moving average of dividends received/accrued × (prime rate – JIBAR).
The crisp question is: how are distributions derived by a vendor qua beneficiary that comprise interest, dividends and capital gains to be dealt with for the purposes of applying BGR 16?
The premise of this article is that the conduit principal should be applied where income derived is distributed in the same year in which the income is derived by the trust and the receipts should be dealt with for the purposes of BGR 16 as if derived by the vendor qua beneficiary, that is, the receipts retain their characterisation as interest, dividends and capital gains. This is how such distributions are dealt with from an income tax and capital gains tax perspective.
SARS has seemingly adopted a different view and argue that the conduit principal does not apply to VAT and the distributions should fall to be dealt with for the purpose of BGR 16 on the same basis as profit shares derived by members/partners from joint venture or partnership arrangements. A profit share derived form a joint venture/partnership is required to be accounted for in the denominator of the prescribed apportionment ratio on the following basis: 3-year moving average of a profit share received/accrued during the year × (prime – JIBAR).

Ngako v Bryte Insurance Company Limited and Another Case number 056972/2024; 2025 JDR 0659 (GP); [2025] ZAGPPHC 81 (31 January 2025)

Ngako v Bryte Insurance Company Limited and Another Case number 056972/2024; 2025 JDR 0659 (GP); [2025] ZAGPPHC 81 (31 January 2025)

Author Daleen Millard

ISSN: 2517-9543
Affiliations: Dean: Faculty of Law, Thompson Rivers University
Source: Juta’s Insurance Law Bulletin, Volume 28 Issue 1, 2025, p. 11-12

Abstract

None

Drakenstein Municipality v Guardrisk Allied Products and Services (Pty) Ltd and Another Case number 2020/12145; 2025 JDR 1243 (GJ); [2025] ZAGPJHC 234 (11 March 2025)

Drakenstein Municipality v Guardrisk Allied Products and Services (Pty) Ltd and Another Case number 2020/12145; 2025 JDR 1243 (GJ); [2025] ZAGPJHC 234 (11 March 2025)

Author Daleen Millard

ISSN: 2517-9543
Affiliations: Dean: Faculty of Law, Thompson Rivers University
Source: Juta’s Insurance Law Bulletin, Volume 28 Issue 1, 2025, p. 12-15

Abstract

None

The Benefits of Teaching and Learning Maritime Economics as a Subject in South African High Schools

The Benefits of Teaching and Learning Maritime Economics as a Subject in South African High Schools

The Benefits of Teaching and Learning Maritime Economics as a Subject in South African High Schools

Author: Aubrey Nhlanhla Sosibo

ISSN: 2790-783X
Affiliations: Maritime Economics Educator, Lawhill Maritime Centre
Source: South African Journal of Maritime Education and Training, Volume 3 Issue 1, p. 1-14
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAJMET/2024/i1a1

Share

Cite this article

Aubrey Nhlanhla Sosibo
The Benefits of Teaching and Learning Maritime Economics as a Subject in South African High Schools
South African Journal of Maritime Education and Training, Volume 3 Issue 1, p. 1-14 https://doi.org/10.47348/SAJMET/2024/i1a1

Abstract

This study examines the benefits of teaching and learning maritime economics as a subject in South African high schools since official approval was given by the Minister of Basic Education in 2009. Initially piloted in 1995 at Simon’s Town School’s Lawhill Maritime Centre, offering maritime economics as a school subject has expanded to 34 high schools across four provinces, namely Eastern Cape, Gauteng, KwaZulu Natal, and Western Cape. Using a qualitative research methodology involving semi-structured interviews, the study reveals several significant benefits, including increased maritime career awareness, diversification of the previously white male-dominated maritime sector, enhanced critical thinking among youth, indirect contributions to economic growth and ensuring a steady supply of partially trained maritime professionals. The research confirms that maritime economics education supports South Africa’s mission to become a maritime nation, while aligning with Africa’s Integrated Marine Strategy (AIMS) 2050, Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want and the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) mandate to ensure sufficient maritime professionals globally. The study concludes that offering maritime economics at the high school level creates exciting career opportunities, reduces youth unemployment and promotes general maritime awareness.

The Benefits of Teaching and Learning Maritime Economics as a Subject in South African High Schools

An Exploratory Review of Maritime Education and Training Through Collaborative Innovation Ecosystems: A Case for South Africa

An Exploratory Review of Maritime Education and Training Through Collaborative Innovation Ecosystems: A Case for South Africa

Author: Nomtha Hadi

ISSN: 2790-783X
Affiliations: Lecturer: Nelson Mandela University Business School
Source: South African Journal of Maritime Education and Training, Volume 3 Issue 1, p. 15-30
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAJMET/2024/i1a2

Share

Cite this article

Nomtha Hadi
An Exploratory Review of Maritime Education and Training Through Collaborative Innovation Ecosystems: A Case for South Africa
South African Journal of Maritime Education and Training, Volume 3 Issue 1, p. 15-30 https://doi.org/10.47348/SAJMET/2024/i1a2

Abstract

The aim of the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development, the ‘Ocean Decade’ (2021–2030) is to trigger the maritime education, training and ocean knowledge revolution needed to promote sustainable maritime economies. Achieving sustainable maritime growth requires identifying critical ocean priorities and promoting training, research capabilities and knowledge that will unlock the potential of science, education and innovation. The maritime industry is vast, complex and everchanging, and requires innovative, collaborative and solutions-oriented maritime education and training (MET). The need for engagement and communication between the various stakeholders and institutions, and the promotion of integrated and collaborative MET approaches, research and innovative activities for sustainable MET can never be overemphasised. South Africa is a country that has a vast coastline, stretching more than 3 900 kilometres, with access to the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, providing abundant opportunities for maritime activities. According to the Human Resource Development Council (HRDC) Annual Report 2020/2021 (HRDC 2023), it is crucial, now more than ever, for South Africa to promote the cutting-edge MET needed to develop the economy and ensure much higher rates of employment from all key sectors, including the maritime industries. A collaboration paradigm in which several training and research institutions collaborate in an ecosystem for the mutual benefit of all members and stakeholders is needed for growing a sustainable maritime economy.