ISSN: 2521-2591
Affiliations: Lead Consultant, Penguide Advisory
Source: South African Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2018, p. 24 – 46
None
ISSN: 2026-8556
Affiliations: None
Source: SADC Law Journal, The, 2012, Issue 2, p. 335 – 339
None
ISSN: 2026-8556
Affiliations: Institute for Security Studies and Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies; Centre of Criminology, University of Cape Town
Source: SADC Law Journal, The, 2012, Issue 2, p. 319 – 334
From the early 1990s onwards, research and policies concerning organised crime in the southern African region have grown apace. But the quest for both quantitative and qualitative research is far from being satisfied. The paper uses an ambitious research project (titled Enhancing Regional Responses to Organised Crime, or EROC) as a case study in order to explore the dynamics which inform and shape research on organised crime from the point of project initiation through to project conceptualisation, data-gathering and analysis, the dissemination of findings, and the formulation of policy recommendations for effective law enforcement. The discussion provides an overview of the many challenges which research on organised crime and law enforcement strategies have to contend with in the southern African region. A critical analysis of the macro- and micro-processes which shape the development of research-based policy interventions in relation to organised crime can contribute to our appreciation of the problem of organised crime itself and of the prospects for police cooperation in the region.
ISSN: 2026-8556
Affiliations: PhD Fellow, Ecole doctorale de droit international et européen, Université Paris
Source: SADC Law Journal, The, 2012, Issue 2, p. 304 – 318
This paper addresses some aspects of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Tribunal’s current review process from a European point of view, comparing elements of European judicial integration with the perspectives for supranational rule of law in southern Africa. It appears that the achievements at stake since the Campbell crisis — namely the Tribunal’s individual complaints mechanism — are only one, albeit important, field of activity for a community judge. Another most intriguing challenge for the cause of regional integration, shared by all African regional courts, remains the use of preliminary ruling procedures by national judges in order to end the radio silence between national and regional judiciaries. Besides pursuing ways to solve this challenge, the search for a proper place for the Tribunal within the community needs to be contextualised in the overall functioning of the institutional setting. Remedies to the current intergovernmentalist overweight will necessarily have to include a strengthening of independent institutions at the regional level; the establishment of a legislative assembly would be particularly promising in this regard.
ISSN: 2026-8556
Affiliations: Research/Teaching Associate, Webber Wentzel Scholar and PhD Candidate, School of Law, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Source: SADC Law Journal, The, 2012, Issue 2, p. 281 – 303
The history of Africa in the 1990s is one of conflicts that reached their height in the Rwanda genocide of 1994. African subregional organisations like the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC) have found themselves undertaking humanitarian military interventions not authorised by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). The African Union (AU) has also shifted its paradigm from regime security to human security by constructing an interventionist legal framework which rests on African subregional organisations for its implementation. This paper examines the existing legal frameworks for humanitarian intervention under the constitutive documents of ECOWAS and SADC, and argues that, in terms of normative reach, there is a conflict between what is envisaged by the AU architecture and what actually exists in the SADC regime, particularly in relation to obtaining UNSC authorisation for humanitarian interventions in Africa. The paper calls for a review of the SADC regime to bring it in line with the AU architecture.