Trade-based illicit financial flows and their impact on fair trade: Will the African Continental Free Trade Area succeed?

by | Nov 8, 2025 | JCLA, JCLA V12 SE

Trade-based illicit financial flows and their impact on fair trade: Will the African Continental Free Trade Area succeed?

Author: Tapiwa Victor Warikandwa

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: LLB, LLM, LLD (UFH). Adjunct Professor, University of Venda, South Africa. Senior Lecturer, Department of Law, University of Botswana
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 12 Special Edition, p. 234–266
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v12/2025-SEa9

Abstract

The African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement and the adoption of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) have brought significant hope of growing foreign direct investment and intra-African trade on the African continent. The AfCFTA sets the basis for sustained belief in African countries’ ability to grow investments, realise sustainable development and eradicate poverty. However, trade-based illicit financial flows (IFFs) could potentially derail any hopes of realising fair trade, sustainable development and ultimately AfCFTA’s success. Trade practices in African countries are often characterised by corruption, trade-based money laundering, bribery, and a general lack of good governance. The AfCFTA Agreement does not address financial crime risks and/or issues. This article discusses how trade-based IFFs will undermine the potential gains of the AfCFTA. It emphasises that a lack of integrity in trade will frustrate the realisation of the AfCFTA Agreement’s key objectives. The article advocates for harmonised AfCFTA rules to curb IFFs to ensure that the AfCFTA succeeds. Stringent trade rules must be adopted to ensure that trade-based IFFs do not undermine foreign direct investments and intra-African trade. The article relies on the Financial Action Task Force guidelines on how to curb trade-based IFFs.

The jurisdiction of competition authorities over Peregrini respondent firms in South African competition law: Revisiting the foreign currency cartel case

by | Nov 8, 2025 | JCLA, JCLA V12 SE

The jurisdiction of competition authorities over Peregrini respondent firms in South African competition law: Revisiting the foreign currency cartel case

Author: Precious Nonhlanhla Ndlovu

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: LLB (UFH), LLM (UWC), LLD. Senior Lecturer, Mercantile & Labour Law, University of the Western Cape
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 12 Special Edition, p. 267–297
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v12/2025-SEa10

Abstract

As it currently stands, the Competition Act 89 of 1998 only explicitly addresses subject-matter jurisdiction in s 3(1) by stipulating that its provisions apply “to all economic activities within or having an effect within” South Africa. When it comes to personal jurisdiction, the Act is silent. This means that the common law principles on personal jurisdiction must be applied. To that end, the forex cartel litigation served to clarify that personal jurisdiction is a mandatory requirement in South African competition law litigation involving peregrini respondent firms, on par with subject-matter jurisdiction. Because the Competition Act does not address the question of personal jurisdiction, the forex cartel litigation provided an opportunity to develop the common law on personal jurisdiction in competition law proceedings. The outcome of the forex cartel case is that personal jurisdiction can be satisfied if the Competition Commission, as prosecutor, can show that there are connecting factors between the prohibited conduct allegedly committed by peregrini respondents, and the Competition Tribunal, as the court of first instance. Considering the difficulties that the Competition Commission faced in establishing personal jurisdiction utilising common principles of personal jurisdiction in the forex cartel case, the legislature ought to consider amending the Competition Act to explicitly make provision for personal jurisdiction, in the way that subject-matter jurisdiction is statutorily defined. That said, the actual enforcement of these judgments against peregrini firms remains an issue to be determined in terms of the individual jurisdictions where such enforcement is sought.

The lessor’s hypothec – for rent?

by | Nov 8, 2025 | SLR, SLR V36 I1

The lessor’s hypothec – for rent?

Author: Graham Glover

ISSN: 1996-2193
Affiliations: BA LLB PhD, Professor, Faculty of Law, Rhodes University
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, Volume 36 Issue 1, 2025, p. 1-15
https://doi.org/10.47348/SLR/2025/i1a1

Abstract

The lessor’s hypothec is a form of real security that has been recognised since the Republican period in Roman law. The hypothec, as it is traditionally understood, allows a lessor to attach and to sell in execution the property on the leased premises to set off arrear rent that the tenant owes. This contribution investigates two questions that have received little attention in the case law and literature. The first is how the concept of rent should be interpreted and understood in a modern world where lease contracts may describe the tenant’s financial obligations in various ways. The second is whether the hypothec should apply to any claims beyond the obligation to pay rent. An argument is made for an expanded approach to the traditional understanding of the application of the hypothec with respect to both questions. Nevertheless, reasons are given as to why this will not unduly stretch the range of application of the hypothec in any significant practical way.

Bwanya, EB and contexts of structural inequality in contracts

by | Nov 8, 2025 | SLR, SLR V36 I1

Bwanya, EB and contexts of structural inequality in contracts

Author: Elsje Bonthuys

ISSN: 1996-2193
Affiliations: BA, LLB, LLM (Stell) PhD (Cantab), Professor, University of the Witwatersrand
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, Volume 36 Issue 1, 2025, p. 16-38
https://doi.org/10.47348/SLR/2025/i1a2

Abstract

Two recent Constitutional Court cases have modified the reasoning about contractual autonomy expressed in the court’s earlier judgment in Volks v Robinson. In Volks, the court held that people who choose not to marry cannot expect to benefit from the rights afforded to spouses – generally called the choice argument. This article examines the effects of these judgments for party autonomy in contracts in general. Bwanya v The Master acknowledges that structural forms of inequality, like gender inequality, can impede parties’ abilities to freely contract, but it is ambiguous on the question whether a right to support will be afforded to unmarried partners on the basis of contract or a familial relationship, or both. This creates uncertainty about the basis of future claims for rights to support in such relationships and opens the door for contractual defences to future claims. EB v ER considered the role of the choice argument in contracts which had turned out to be detrimental to one party. It confirmed the central role of pacta sunt servanda in public policy on contracts, but decided the matter on the basis of the unfair discrimination test in Harksen v Lane. Together, the cases create a chink in the armour of pacta sunt servanda and the choice argument for broader reconsideration of autonomy and fairness in contract law.

Learners resolving conflict: integrating mandatory peer mediation in South African public high schools to address issues of discipline

by | Nov 8, 2025 | SLR, SLR V36 I1

Learners resolving conflict: integrating mandatory peer mediation in South African public high schools to address issues of discipline

Authors: Monique Carels and Muofhe Tshifularo

ISSN: 1996-2193
Affiliations: LLB, LLM (Dispute Resolution), LLM (Labour Law), Lecturer, University of Cape Town; LLB, LLM (Dispute Resolution), Admitted Attorney
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, Volume 36 Issue 1, 2025, p. 39-60
https://doi.org/10.47348/SLR/2025/i1a3

 Abstract

Disputes are a natural part of school life, and unfortunately, bullying, harassment, victimisation, and assaults have become all too common in South African public high schools. Schools face significant disciplinary challenges, with issues of ill-discipline on the rise in schools across the country. However, the current school disciplinary procedures adopted by most public high schools fail to address the root causes of these problems and do not provide concrete solutions.
This article aims to explore the idea of implementing mandatory peer mediation in South African public high schools as a way to resolve conflicts and address issues of discipline. It will begin by briefly examining the school disciplinary procedure, before discussing its shortcomings. Next, it will examine the concept of peer mediation and compare it to the disciplinary hearing process. To gain a deeper understanding of how peer mediation could be integrated into the school environment, we will look at the experience in New Zealand. Finally, the article will discuss the practicalities of implementing mandatory peer mediation in South African high schools.