Developing critical citizenship in LLB students: the role of a decolonised legal history course

Developing critical citizenship in LLB students: the role of a decolonised legal history course

Author: Lize-Mari Mitchell

ISSN: 2411-7870
Affiliations: Lecturer, University of Limpopo.
Source: Fundamina, Volume 26 Issue 2, p. 337-363
https://doi.org/10.47348/FUND/v26/i2a3

Abstract

Within the neoliberal ideals of society, social science subjects are battling for their rightful place in curriculums. As a result, legal history courses are being presented by increasingly less universities in South Africa. In the tendency towards a skills-based LLB, higher education institutions are neglecting to acknowledge the immense impact students’ ideologies and critical thinking will have on the future of South Africa. This contribution argues that it is not only possible to deliver competitive graduates, to retain social subjects and to heed the call for decolonisation, but that a transformative, decolonised legal history course is vital to these ideals. The contribution explores the role of such a course in the development of LLB graduates where it strives towards constitutional ideals and social justice. Furthermore, it takes a look at legal history as a form of critical citizenship education, where it is based on the holistic development of students within constant critical self-reflection and the promotion of a common set of shared values. The development of critical citizenship in students are explored by defining this concept, as well as by discussing the manner in which it can be taught and the importance to the so-called born-free LLB student. This study concludes with broad outlines of the manner in which a legal history course would have to be presented within a critical pedagogy to achieve the aims of critical citizenship.

On Florentinus’ definition of Libertas

On Florentinus’ definition of Libertas

Author: Carlos Amunátegui Perelló

ISSN: 2411-7870
Affiliations: Professor of Roman Law, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Source: Fundamina, Volume 26 Issue 2, p. 364-373
https://doi.org/10.47348/FUND/v26/i2a4

Abstract

Libertas is one of the main concepts of public life in the Roman world. It has a public content when referring to the freedom of the Republic, and a private implication when it is opposed to slavery. Florentinus’ definition of libertas is quite interesting, because it was given within the context of slavery, although it does not fit that scenario entirely. In fact, it seems more cogent with regard to the public concept of libertas. This contribution analyses this aspect in detail.

Keeping the natives in their place: the ideology of white supremacy and the flogging of African offenders in colonial Natal – part 1

Keeping the natives in their place: the ideology of white supremacy and the flogging of African offenders in colonial Natal – part 1

Keeping the natives in their place: the ideology of white supremacy and the flogging of African offenders in colonial Natal – part 1

Authors: Stephen Allister Peté

ISSN: 2411-7870
Affiliations: BA LLB (University of Natal) LLM (University of Cape Town) M Phil (University of Cambridge) PhD (University of KwaZulu-Natal). Associate Professor, School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Source: Fundamina, Volume 26 Issue 2, p. 374-423
https://doi.org/10.47348/FUND/v26/i2a5

Share

Cite this article

Peté, SA
Keeping the natives in their place: the ideology of white supremacy and the flogging of African offenders in colonial Natal – part 1
Fundamina, Volume 26 Issue 2, p. 374-423
https://doi.org/10.47348/FUND/v26/i2a5

Abstract

The political economy of colonial Natal was based on a coercive and hierarchical racial order. Over decades, the white colonists struggled to assert their power over the indigenous inhabitants of the colony, to force them off their land and into wage labour in service of the white colonial economy. This process resulted in ongoing resistance on the part of the indigenous population, including a series of rebellions and revolts throughout the colonial period, which were met with force by the white colonists. White colonial ideology was shaped by the violent and adversarial nature of the social, political and economic relations between white and black in the colony. It was also influenced by the broader global context, within which colonisation was justified by racist variants of the theory of Social Darwinism. Driven by a strange mix of deep insecurity and fear on the one hand, and racist paternalism on the other, the white settlers of colonial Natal developed a variant of white supremacist ideology with a special flavour. Nowhere was this more apparent than in their near obsession with flogging as the most appropriate manner of dealing with African offenders in particular. By closely examining a series of public debates that took place in the colony of Natal between 1876 and 1906, this contribution seeks to excavate the various nuanced strands of thinking that together comprised the ideology of white supremacy in the colony at that time.

“What’s past is prologue”: an historical overview of judicial review in South Africa – part 2

“What’s past is prologue”: an historical overview of judicial review in South Africa – part 2

Author: D M Pretorius

ISSN: 2411-7870
Affiliations: BA LLB (Stell) BA (Hons) LLM PGCE (SA) PhD (Witwatersrand). Partner: Bowmans, Johannesburg.
Source: Fundamina, Volume 26 Issue 2, p. 424-519
https://doi.org/10.47348/FUND/v26/i2a6

Abstract

This contribution explores the historical origins and development of judicial review in South Africa, as an indication of shifts in relations between – and of the relative legal and political powers of – the three branches of state. It also provides bibliographical details of sources chronicling these historical processes. The first part focused mainly on constitutional review, namely the power of the law courts to test the validity of statutes against constitutional criteria. This second part analyses the historical development of administrative law, especially the common-law evolution of judicial review of the decision-making processes of organs of state, and how that process unfolded reciprocally with political shifts in twentieth-century South Africa. There is also a synopsis of the introduction of administrative law as a discrete subject in South African law schools. Finally, this contribution briefly explores historical aspects of the role of interpretation of statutes in the context of administrative law, and briefly touches on special statutory review as distinct from common-law review.

No reflective loss: The English approach reconsidered

No reflective loss: The English approach reconsidered

Author: Ataollah Rahmani

ISSN: 2521-2575
Affiliations: Lecturer in Commercial Law, Al-Maktoum College of Higher Education Dundee, Scotland, UK
Source: Journal of Corporate and Commercial Law & Practice, Volume 6 Issue 2, 2020, p. 1 – 48
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCCL/V6/i2a1

Abstract

A company shareholder should have no difficulty in commencing a claim to recover the loss suffered due to a wrong done to their personal property. The right to the protection of property is a fundamental human right in English law. A wronged person whose property right is infringed will have the right to commence legal proceedings against wrongdoers. However, in the company context, the exercise of a shareholder’s right of action may conflict with the company’s right of action where the loss sought is reflective. The English company law’s arrangement has been that a shareholder’s action is exceptional beyond which it will routinely be barred through the principle of the ‘no reflective loss’. Where company’s loss and the shareholders’ loss are reflectively linked, then the company’s action prevails against the shareholder action. This paper argues that the two actions should swap places in law. Shareholder action should be recognised as a general principle of law while it is barred exceptionally in circumstances where stronger policy considerations such as the observation of the corporate autonomy are to be prioritised. This article refers to company law in the UK.