ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Associate Professor, University of the Witwatersrand, School of Law
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 36 Issue 2, 2024, p. 346 – 360
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v36/i2a10
None
ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Senior Lecturer, Department of Mercantile Law, University of Pretoria
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 36 Issue 2, 2024, p. 346 – 360
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v36/i2a11
None
ISSN: 2411-7870
Affiliations: BA BA(Hons) MA DLitt (UP) LLB LLD (Unisa). Professor, Department of Jurisprudence, School of Law, University of South Africa; BA (UFS) BA(Hons) (US) HED (UFS) LLB (Unisa) LLD (UFS). Professor, Department of Jurisprudence, School of Law, University of South Africa
Source: Fundamina, Volume 30 Issue 2, p. 1-32
https://doi.org/10.47348/FUND/v30/i2a1
The current legal framework regulating human tissue and organ procurement, removal and use is inconsistent, inadequate and often ambiguous. By tracing the legal developments relating to the regulation of human tissue and organs since the inception of the first South African regulatory framework in 1952, this contribution seeks to determine the origin of existing limitations and challenges pertaining to this field. Case law is also discussed to illustrate the lack of understanding and complexity regarding the application of the relevant provisions in a practical context. The study concludes with a number of recommendations aimed at closing the identified gaps, based on past best practice emerging from the legal-historical analysis conducted.
ISSN: 2411-7870
Affiliations: Law Professor at Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Faculty of Law, Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University, Brunei Darussalam. LLB (Hons) MA (Composite History) LLM (Constitutional Law and Administrative Law) (Lucknow University) LLM (IT and Telecom Law) (University of Strathclyde) LLD (Meerut University); PhD Law candidate at Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Faculty of Law, Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University, Brunei Darussalam. HND (Islamic criminal justice system) (Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University) BA (Sharīʻah law) (Hons) (Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University) LLB (Hons) (Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University) LLM (International law) (Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University)
Source: Fundamina, Volume 30 Issue 2, p. 33-63
https://doi.org/10.47348/FUND/v30/i2a2
In the twelfth century, the establishment of common law under Henry II, king of England, marked a pivotal moment in the evolution of the English legal system. While the roots of this legal framework are traditionally traced back to Roman and canon law traditions, there is ongoing debate among historians regarding potential direct influences from Islamic legal institutions. Arab civilisation significantly influenced the identity of Sicily, ruling the island for more than two centuries until its conquest by Norman knights in 1061. This contribution seeks to examine critically the historical connections between classical Islamic law, as practised in Arab Sicily, and specific legal principles evident in the common law of England. The analysis delves into the origins of concepts, such as trust (waqf), the primacy of law over the state, individual freedoms, contractual freedom, judicial impartiality and the doctrine of res judicata. It conducts a comparative study to highlight the similarities and differences between these two legal systems. This study clearly indicates that the interaction between Islamic and common law traditions left a lasting imprint on legal systems worldwide, underscoring the significance of cultural exchange, but also emphasises the dynamic nature of legal evolution through cross-cultural influences.
ISSN: 2411-7870
Affiliations: Attorney and Conveyancer of the High Court of South Africa. BCom (Law) LLB LLM (University of Pretoria) LLD candidate (University of Johannesburg)
Source: Fundamina, Volume 30 Issue 2, p. 64-124
https://doi.org/10.47348/FUND/v30/i2a3
This contribution explores the historical background of genocide in international law, emphasising its role in shaping the current legal framework for preventing and punishing genocide. The discussion begins by taking a look at the origins of the term “genocide” as introduced to international law after World War II through the Genocide Convention of 1948. This contribution highlights the extensive historical context of the concept of genocide, emphasising the need to examine it from an international public-law perspective to understand the obligations placed on states for preventing genocide. The recent case law before the International Court of Justice in cases brought by Ukraine and South Africa illustrate the importance of genocide in the contemporary international legal context. South Africa requested the court to grant an order for Israel to suspend its military operations in and against Gaza. The court chose to rather follow precedent and granted the order that Israel take all reasonably available measures to prevent genocide. This was predictable as the court has an extensive history of interpreting the crime of genocide. This contribution discusses the legal status of genocide by looking at reports from the International Law Commission, relevant case law of the International Court of Justice and international instruments signed to enforce obligations toward genocide prevention. It provides a much-needed academic summary of the interpretation of genocidal acts as mentioned in the Convention, as well as of the obligations of states toward the prevention of genocide under international law. Such research is relevant as the prevention of genocide remains a priority in the international community.