Female genital mutilation in Nigeria and Burkina Faso: Safeguarding the rights of women and girls in Africa

by | Mar 12, 2023 | JCLA, JCLA V9 I2 2022

Female genital mutilation in Nigeria and Burkina Faso: Safeguarding the rights of women and girls in Africa

Author: Olaitan O. Olusegun

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: Lecturer, Faculty of Law, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 9 Issue 2, p. 102 – 136
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v9/i2a4

Abstract

Article 2 of the Convention against the Elimination of Discrimination against Women explicitly prohibits violence against women, which was defined to include Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). FGM is a practice which is entrenched in African culture. Archaic as this practice is, it is widely carried out in several countries, with its attendant deleterious effects. Nigeria and Burkina Faso have a high prevalence of FGM but have made legislative efforts to curb the practice. Burkina Faso has, however, employed additional measures to ensure their laws” enforcement, which has effectively changed the cultural attitudes of several communities towards FGM in the country. This study uses a doctrinal approach to examine the prevalence, mode of operation and legal framework enacted to protect girls and women from FGM in Nigeria and Burkina Faso. It further discusses the efforts taken in Burkina Faso to implement and enforce their laws, in addition to the challenges inherent in enforcing FGM, laws in Nigeria. This article found that enforcement of laws is key to eliminating FGM and Nigeria needs to take urgent measures to enforce their FGM legislation like Burkina Faso.

Notes: The Krugersdorp gang rapes — Another Tshabalala v S; Ntuli v S?

by | Feb 19, 2023 | SALJ, SALJ V140 I1 2023

Notes: The Krugersdorp gang rapes — Another Tshabalala v S; Ntuli v S?

Author: Jolandi le Roux-Bouwer

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: Professor of Law, University of South Africa
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 140 Issue 1, p. 1-16
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v140/i1a1

Abstract

This note assesses the application of the common purpose doctrine to the crime of gang rape. The recent gang rape of eight women in West Village, Krugersdorp on 28 July 2022 received wide media coverage. If and when there is a prosecution, the courts will have to adjudicate on the application of the common purpose doctrine to the newly defined statutory crime of rape. The Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters Amendment) Act 32 of 2007 (‘SORMA’) came into effect on 16 December 2007. The Constitutional Court, in Tshabalala v S; Ntuli v S 2020 (2) SACR 38 (CC), held that the common purpose doctrine was applicable to the autographic crime of common-law rape. Since the alleged crimes had occurred in 1998, SORMA was not applicable in this case. If the Krugersdorp gang rape incident reaches the Constitutional Court the case may provide the court with the opportunity to elucidate on the practical impact of its decision in Tshabalala v S; Ntuli v S.

Notes: Do retirement funds have a right to transfer accrued retirement benefits without non-member spouses’ consent? An analysis of the Collatz matter

by | Feb 19, 2023 | SALJ, SALJ V140 I1 2023

Notes: Do retirement funds have a right to transfer accrued retirement benefits without non-member spouses’ consent? An analysis of the Collatz matter

Author: Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: Associate Professor, University of the Witwatersrand; Visiting Associate Professor, National University of Lesotho
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 140 Issue 1, p. 17-37
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v140/i1a2

Abstract

Neither the legislature nor the courts have adequately determined how to regulate benefits that retirement fund members married in community of property derive a right to claim before their death. It illustrates the failure of the courts to assess the intersection between matrimonial principles and pension rules when faced with nonmember spouses who argue that their deceased member spouses’ retirement benefits accrued to their joint estates. The courts need to consider seriously the applicability of matrimonial principles before retirement benefits can be treated as death benefits. Further, the note demonstrates that the courts over-emphasise the role of pension rules and totally disregard matrimonial principles, thereby depriving surviving non-member spouses of their share of the accrued retirement benefits. This note further argues that the legislature should urgently intervene.

Notes: Municipal crisis: A justifiable limitation of political rights

by | Feb 19, 2023 | SALJ, SALJ V140 I1 2023

Notes: Municipal crisis: A justifiable limitation of political rights

Author: Matt Williams

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: Candidate Attorney, Webber Wentzel
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 140 Issue 1, p. 38-52
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v140/i1a3

Abstract

Section 56A of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 provided for the limitation of the political rights of municipal managers and managers directly accountable to municipal managers. The South African Municipal Workers Union (SAMWU) challenged the constitutionality of s 56A on both procedural and substantive grounds in the High Court. The substantive ground related to whether s 56A was a justifiable limitation of the s 19(1) right to make free political choices. Having found for SAMWU on procedural grounds the High Court did not decide the substantive ground. The Constitutional Court confirmed the High Court’s order. The nett result is that there has not been a judicial pronouncement on whether s 56A is a justifiable limitation of political rights. The successor provision to s 56A is s 71B, which was inserted into the Act by s 9 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Amendment Act 3 of 2022. This provision provides for the limitation of the political rights of municipal staff members. In the absence of a judicial pronouncement on this issue, this note applies a justification analysis in terms of s 36 of the Constitution and finds that s 71B is a justifiable limitation of the right to make free political choices.

Customary international law is law in South Africa — Now what? Analysing the courts’ identification and application of customary international law over the last decade

by | Feb 19, 2023 | SALJ, SALJ V140 I1 2023

Customary international law is law in South Africa — Now what? Analysing the courts’ identification and application of customary international law over the last decade

Author: Andreas Coutsoudis

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: Advocate, KwaZulu-Natal Bar; Honorary Research Fellow, University of KwaZulu-Natal
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 140 Issue 1, p. 53-94
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v140/i1a4

Abstract

Customary international law is law in South Africa as much as property law, company law or contract law. It may not be as frequently relevant or applicable as many parts of domestic law. Courts and domestic legal practitioners may not be as familiar with its contours, nuances and methods of identification. But it is precisely for these reasons that it matters more, not less, how courts, legal practitioners and the parties they represent approach it. This article describes and analyses South African courts’ engagement with customary international law, particularly over the last decade. The analysis reveals that important issues of customary international law are determined and applied by South African courts. Thus, customary international law cannot be avoided; nor should it be. However, the analysis also reveals that the courts’ engagement with customary international law would benefit from a more reflective, rigorous and considered approach. Building on the analysis and description of South African courts’ past identification and application of customary international law, the article offers suggestions for how the road ahead ought to be navigated. It is past time for South African courts to give proper consideration as to how, both procedurally and substantively, they and the parties before them ought to approach the identification of customary international law. For customary international law is not some exotic and indeterminate set of rules emanating from another legal system. It is part of South African law. The sooner it is fully treated as such, the better it will be for courts, practitioners, litigants, and international law more generally.