Transformative competition law or protectionism? Assessing the rise of the ‘B-BBEE test’ in merger analysis through ECP Africa Fund IV LLC & others v Competition Commission of South Africa [2021] ZACT 99

CASE NOTES

Transformative competition law or protectionism? Assessing the rise of the ‘B-BBEE test’ in merger analysis through ECP Africa Fund IV LLC & others v Competition Commission of South Africa [2021] ZACT 99

Author: Simbarashe Tavuyanago

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Associate Professor, Department of Mercantile Law
University of South Africa
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 36 Issue 2, 2024, p. 297 – 318
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v36/i2a8

 Abstract

None

The National Credit Act 34 of 2005 and the requirement of ‘E-signing in the physical presence of each contracting party’: Firstrand Bank Limited v Molamugae (24558/2016) [2018] ZAGPPHC 762; Firstrand Bank Limited v Silver Solutions 3138 CC (8400/2022P) [2023] ZAKZPHC 26 (7 March 2023); and Firstrand Bank Limited v Govender (2021/25131) [2023] ZAGPJHC 610 (1 June 2023)

CASE NOTES

The National Credit Act 34 of 2005 and the requirement of ‘E-signing in the physical presence of each contracting party’: Firstrand Bank Limited v Molamugae (24558/2016) [2018] ZAGPPHC 762; Firstrand Bank Limited v Silver Solutions 3138 CC (8400/2022P) [2023] ZAKZPHC 26 (7 March 2023); and Firstrand Bank Limited v Govender (2021/25131) [2023] ZAGPJHC 610 (1 June 2023)

Author: Ciresh Singh

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Associate Professor, Department of Mercantile Law
University of South Africa
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 36 Issue 2, 2024, p. 319 – 332
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v36/i2a9

 Abstract

None

Navigating double jeopardy in Tax Law Motloung v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service

CASE NOTES

Navigating double jeopardy in Tax Law Motloung v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service

Author: Carika Keulder

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Associate Professor, University of the Witwatersrand, School of Law
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 36 Issue 2, 2024, p. 346 – 360
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v36/i2a10

 Abstract

None

The role of consumer courts and the Motor Industry Ombudsman of South Africa in the realisation of rights for consumers: A critical analysis of KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Protector v Jatru Trading (Pty) Ltd t/a Trucking Traders [2023] ZANCT 14

CASE NOTES

The role of consumer courts and the Motor Industry Ombudsman of South Africa in the realisation of rights for consumers: A critical analysis of KwaZulu-Natal Consumer Protector v Jatru Trading (Pty) Ltd t/a Trucking Traders [2023] ZANCT 14

Author: Tshepiso Scott-Ngoepe

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Senior Lecturer, Department of Mercantile Law, University of Pretoria
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 36 Issue 2, 2024, p. 346 – 360
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v36/i2a11

 Abstract

None

The Procurement, Removal and Use of Human Tissue and Organs in South African Law: a Legal-Historical Analysis

The Procurement, Removal and Use of Human Tissue and Organs in South African Law: a Legal-Historical Analysis

Authors Melodie Labuschaigne and Magda Slabbert

ISSN: 2411-7870
Affiliations: BA BA(Hons) MA DLitt (UP) LLB LLD (Unisa). Professor, Department of Jurisprudence, School of Law, University of South Africa; BA (UFS) BA(Hons) (US) HED (UFS) LLB (Unisa) LLD (UFS). Professor, Department of Jurisprudence, School of Law, University of South Africa
Source: Fundamina, Volume 30 Issue 2, p. 1-32
https://doi.org/10.47348/FUND/v30/i2a1

Abstract

The current legal framework regulating human tissue and organ procurement, removal and use is inconsistent, inadequate and often ambiguous. By tracing the legal developments relating to the regulation of human tissue and organs since the inception of the first South African regulatory framework in 1952, this contribution seeks to determine the origin of existing limitations and challenges pertaining to this field. Case law is also discussed to illustrate the lack of understanding and complexity regarding the application of the relevant provisions in a practical context. The study concludes with a number of recommendations aimed at closing the identified gaps, based on past best practice emerging from the legal-historical analysis conducted.