Not “radical” enough: Disrupting the narrative of Ermelo’s grand transformative potential in public basic education

by | Mar 17, 2025 | SLR, SLR V35 I2

Not “radical” enough: Disrupting the narrative of Ermelo’s grand transformative potential in public basic education

Author: Lorette Arendse

ISSN: 1996-2193
Affiliations: LLB LLM LLD
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, Volume 35 Issue 2, 2024, p. 178-194
https://doi.org/10.47348/SLR/2024/i2a4

Abstract

The Constitutional Court decision in Head of Department, Mpumalanga Department of Education v Hoërskool Ermelo 2010 2 SA 415 (CC) is often celebrated in education law jurisprudence. The Constitutional Court’s call for the radical transformation of public education is zealously repeated in academic discourse. In particular, the apex Court is lauded for the formulation of principles applicable to school governing bodies on how to develop constitutionally compliant language policies in terms of section 29(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. This provision guarantees the right to education in the language of choice in public educational institutions subject to the criterion of reasonable practicability. In the subsequent decision of Gelyke Kanse v Chairperson of the Senate of the University of Stellenbosch 2019 12 BCLR 1479 (CC), the Constitutional Court evaluated the constitutionality of another language policy, this time in the higher education context, but adopted a markedly different approach to the interpretation of section 29(2). Using a particular conceptualisation of transformation as theoretical lens and by contrasting the judicial approaches in the two Constitutional Court judgments, this contribution advances the idea that the Court in Ermelo was myopic in its approach by failing to recognise that some school governing bodies reinforce systemic racial inequality in public schools through the adoption of language policies.

The divergent approaches of the Constitutional Court to the right to life and ubuntu and the implications for civil society

by | Mar 17, 2025 | SLR, SLR V35 I2

The divergent approaches of the Constitutional Court to the right to life and ubuntu and the implications for civil society

Authors: Keith Matthee and Shaun de Freitas

ISSN: 1996-2193
Affiliations: BA LLB BD; BProc LLB LLM LLD
Source: Stellenbosch Law Review, Volume 35 Issue 2, 2024, p. 195 – 219
https://doi.org/10.47348/SLR/2023/i2a5

Abstract

There are indications of an unduly deferential attitude towards the justices of the Constitutional Court when they pronounce on profound moral issues which deeply affect the moral fabric of South African society. A key to addressing this deference is to demonstrate the divergent approaches of the Constitutional Court when making such pronouncements. An awareness of these differing approaches has the potential to influence civil society to participate confidently in the process of giving the Constitutional text representative forms of meaning and, in the process, of buttressing democracy. As an illustration of the divergencies stemming from the Constitutional Court regarding fundamental moral matters, the most important of all the rights in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 has been chosen, namely, the right to life, more specifically pertaining to the death penalty and abortion. Accompanying this is a critical investigation into a foundational hermeneutic chosen by the Constitutional Court when giving content to the right to life, namely, ubuntu. Also, naturally emanating from this contribution is the advancement of right to life jurisprudence in South Africa.

The present as history: Workers’ struggles and the law during and after apartheid

by | Mar 16, 2025 | ACTA, ACTA 2024

The present as history: Workers’ struggles and the law during and after apartheid

Authors Kally Forrest & Edward Webster

ISSN: 1996-2088
Affiliations: Former trade unionist and editor of the South African Labour Bulletin; Associate of the Southern Centre for Inequality Studies, and the Society, Work and Politics Institute; Fellow at the Johannesburg Institute for Advanced Studies; Edward Webster passed away on 6 March 2024. At the time, he was a Research Professor at the Southern Centre for Inequality Studies and held the
position of Professor Emeritus in the School of Social Sciences at the University of the Witwatersrand
Source: Acta Juridica, 2024, p. 1-31
https://doi.org/10.47348/ACTA/2024/a1

Abstract

Black workers in South Africa in the 1970s fought successfully for their right to be included in the law. Through militant struggles, and with the aid of pioneering lawyers like Halton Cheadle, they produced an inclusive Labour Relations Act (LRA) and the attendant Basic Conditions of Employment Act. Through its independent power base connected to the shopfloor, the labour movement gave trade unions the capacity to mobilise and restrain members, which they used to negotiate to expand legal rights and organisational space and pursue worker control at workplace and industry levels. However, the LRA, and its employer–employee binary, marginalises informal workers, and these workers are now waging a battle for recognition. The struggle for informal workers’ rights unfolds in a more challenging environment than the 1970s, and no significant changes in law have emerged in the last twenty years of organising. This makes redefining the LRA complex, as informal workers may be own account workers and micro-employers. Labour law is not responsive to the needs of workers in the informal economy and an experimental environment is encouraged. The world of work has changed to such an extent that perhaps we now need the equivalent of the Wiehahn Commission, which transformed the world of labour in the 1980s.

An elusive pursuit: Challenging invalid dismissals – then and now

by | Mar 16, 2025 | ACTA, ACTA 2024

An elusive pursuit: Challenging invalid dismissals – then and now

Author Paul Benjamin

ISSN: 1996-2088
Affiliations: BA LLB (UCT) LLM (Warwick); Director, Cheadle Thompson & Haysom Inc; Extraordinary Professor, Faculty of Law, University of the Western Cape
Source: Acta Juridica, 2024, p. 32-54
https://doi.org/10.47348/ACTA/2024/a2

Abstract

The independent trade union movement that emerged from the 1973 Durban strikes developed legal strategies to protect their members, who were primarily African workers excluded from participation under the Industrial Conciliation Act 28 of 1956. Chief among these strategies was the institution of litigation seeking to nullify dismissals that violated statutory victimisation provisions in those laws that covered African workers. The apartheid-era bench was largely hostile to this approach, and it was not until the 1982 full bench decision in National Union of Textile Workers v Stag Packings that orders of nullity and reinstatement became a possibility. However, by this time the powers of the industrial court, which had been established in 1980, had been extended to include status quo orders and the unions were able to achieve unprecedented protection for their members as the industrial court asserted its unfair labour practice powers. This article explores the legal strategies reflected in the litigation and engaged scholarly writing that gave rise to this important judgment and comments on its significance for contemporary labour law in South Africa.

The evolution of the right to fair procedure in dismissals for misconduct

by | Mar 16, 2025 | ACTA, ACTA 2024

The evolution of the right to fair procedure in dismissals for misconduct

Author André van Niekerk

ISSN: 1996-2088
Affiliations: BA LLB MA (Witwatersrand) LLM (Leicester); Judge of the Labour Appeal Court of South Africa
Source: Acta Juridica, 2024, p. 55-86
https://doi.org/10.47348/ACTA/2024/a3

Abstract

The obligation to follow a fair procedure before dismissing an employee for misconduct, certainly in the private sector, has its origins in the concept of the unfair labour practice, introduced in 1979 by way of an amendment to the Labour Relations Act 28 of 1956. This article traces the history of the development of a right to fair procedure before a decision to dismiss, and attempts to identify the normative basis of and justifications for that right. These included international standards, comparative law, the principles of administrative law applicable to public sector employees, and employer best practice. By 1994, a ‘criminal justice’ model had evolved, in which pre-dismissal procedures were equated with procedures applied in a criminal court. The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (in particular, the Code of Good Practice: Dismissal) attempted to reduce the cost of elaborate workplace procedures. The legislative package introduced a system of compulsory arbitration for disputed dismissals, with a primary remedy of reinstatement for dismissals found to be substantively unfair, and compensatory awards for dismissals found to be substantively fair, but procedurally unfair. This approach reflects both respect for the autonomy and dignity of the employee, and a justification based on maximising the general welfare. The general welfare is maximised by accommodating the diversity and flexibility of procedural standards, promoting rational decision-making in disciplinary matters, and eliminating the cost of duplicated processes. The Code thus ultimately seeks to combine the normative ideals of worker protection with the achievement of productive efficiency.