Note: Dispute resolution mechanisms in employment contracts – when should the Labour Court intervene? SA Football Players Union & others v Free State Stars Football Club (Pty) Ltd

Note: Dispute resolution mechanisms in employment contracts – when should the Labour Court intervene? SA Football Players Union & others v Free State Stars Football Club (Pty) Ltd

Authors Kershwyn Bassuday

ISSN: 2413-9874
Affiliations: Lecturer, Commercial Law Department, Faculty of Law, University of Cape Town
Source: Industrial Law Journal, Volume 39 Issue 1, 2018, p. 97 – 105

Abstract

None

Note: Large-scale operational requirements dismissals: How effective are the remedies? A discussion of Steenkamp & others v Edcon (National Union of Metalworkers of SA intervening) (2016) 37 ILJ 564 (CC)

Note: Large-scale operational requirements dismissals: How effective are the remedies? A discussion of Steenkamp & others v Edcon (National Union of Metalworkers of SA intervening) (2016) 37 ILJ 564 (CC)

Authors Tungamirai Kujinga, Stefan van Eck

ISSN: 2413-9874
Affiliations: None; Professor of Labour Law, Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria; Director, Centre for Insolvency, Labour and Company Law (CILC)
Source: Industrial Law Journal, Volume 39 Issue 1, 2018, p. 76 – 88

Abstract

None

Rana Plaza tragedy: Who is to blame?

Rana Plaza tragedy: Who is to blame?

Authors Asif Salahuddin

ISSN: 2413-9874
Affiliations: Lecturer in Law, Metropolitan University, Sylhet, Bangladesh
Source: Industrial Law Journal, Volume 39 Issue 1, 2018, p. 51 – 75

Abstract

In 2013 Bangladesh experienced a tragic accident in the garment industry with the Rana Plaza building collapse, which led to large-scale human casualties. The incident highlighted the deplorable labour conditions in the country. As Bangladesh’s garment industry is export oriented, the disaster raises questions about the corporate social responsibility of foreign corporations. This article assesses the responsibility of such companies as well as that of the government of Bangladesh for the incident and other similar industrial accidents. Although Bangladesh has been a member of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) since 1972 and has ratified most of its core conventions, their implementation appears to be far from effective in practice. The ILO’s inability to sanction or to penalise countries that fail to implement the ratified conventions is a drawback and prevents it from being an effective organisation although it is the sole labour organisation to oversee labour standards and working conditions globally. The article ends with a number of recommendations aimed at facilitating the effective implementation of controls designed to improve labour standards and conditions in Bangladesh and other developing countries.

The sounds of silence: The evolution of the concept of derivative misconduct and the role of inferences

The sounds of silence: The evolution of the concept of derivative misconduct and the role of inferences

Authors Tarryn Poppesqou

ISSN: 2413-9874
Affiliations: Director, Futcher & Poppesqou Attorneys
Source: Industrial Law Journal, Volume 39 Issue 1, 2018, p. 34 – 50

Abstract

In what circumstances may an employer dismiss a group of employees which includes the unidentified perpetrator or perpetrators of a proven misconduct? Is an employer entitled to draw inferences from circumstantial evidence and rely on those inferences in dismissing a group of employees where such misconduct has occurred? May an employee elect to remain silent when he or she has knowledge of conduct which may negatively impact the employer’s business? What rights and obligations do employees in such a group have? These are questions which have arisen and have been dealt with by our labour courts, resulting in a test for derivative misconduct which currently extends to a duty placed upon employees to come forward in the face of misconduct perpetrated by fellow employees.

The national minimum wage: how best to align it with the existing labour regulatory framework

The national minimum wage: how best to align it with the existing labour regulatory framework

Authors Shane Godfrey, Mario Jacobs

ISSN: 2413-9874
Affiliations: Coordinator, Labour and Enterprise Policy Research Group, University of Cape Town; Researcher, Labour and Enterprise Policy Research Group, University of Cape Town
Source: Industrial Law Journal, Volume 39 Issue 1, 2018, p. 1 – 33

Abstract

A national minimum wage (NMW) of R20 per hour will be introduced from 1 May 2018, which will set an absolute floor with which contracts of employment, collective agreements and sectoral determinations must comply. It will be introduced in a dedicated statute but will require alignment with or accommodation by existing labour statutes, in particular the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA), the Labour Relations Act, the Employment Equity Act, the Employment Services Act, and the Employment Tax Incentive Act. The article examines the potential points of conflict between the NMW and the above five statutes and discusses how these can be resolved. Key issues are whether the NMW should be introduced in a dedicated statute or via the BCEA as a sectoral determination; who will be covered by the NMW; what the impact will be on ordinary hours of work; what the composition of the NMW will be and whether deductions will be allowed; what will happen to sectoral determinations; who will grant exemptions and who will enforce the NMW; and how its impact on disproportionate vertical income differentials can be maximised. It is also argued that the NMW is of a different order to existing minimum wage setting mechanisms and will have a more extensive impact on existing legislation than anticipated. This raises the question whether it is time for an examination of the entire labour legislative framework.